Considering the amount of throw this round has had its quite safe to say that it clearly disrupted plenty of runners. A few directly benefited from it and a few got completely crushed by it. Its very hard to blame a runner for this since the throwers actions has mostly been directly against a select few runners while some lucky and others were collateral damage or coincidentally benefited simply by being opposite alignmen
A few pastebins made towards various throwing users.
We will reach a conclusion this cycle, so the round will end one way or another within 15 hours.
Poll
What course of action should we take?
Reset the round.45%40
Let the round end, only ban the GT alts.43%38
Other.6%6
Suspend elynia and then let the round end.4%4
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
fixed
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years agoedited
delete this comment mist
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
Chilled out all your puns are bad you should know this by now friend <3
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
is expose biased in this matter? yes, obviously.
does that mean she shouldnt be allowed to put forward her opinion or make an objective list of tallying who won & lost games in the thrown games the cheating investigation team forward? no, that would be dumb.
1
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
I don't think w/l ratio has to do with meta abuse it's just you play so many games with a person it makes it really easy to read them and even the meta itself
The logic you're bringing up cody is like saying if me and Nat played 40 games in comp but the win loss is 50% that couldn't be meta abuse
ChilledOut has joined the club of people who prefer to call people by their old usernames because they think it makes them look cool and knowledgable to others. lmfao. Like very obviously Lana doesn't use lolwot anymore so maybe call her by the account she uses now...?
yeah no way should expose be on this case that's not clever
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
i'm really having trouble figuring out what part of this you take issue with shacky.
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years agoedited
and they are. and expose's opinion isn't being weighed as a mod's opinion. not that i think a mod's opinion is necessarily worth more than anyone else's, honestly, it's just we happen to be the ones making the final decision.
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
Also, Sims, I don't know if it means anything to you, but there is a whole investigation team composed of some role mods and a couple site mods, which means expose was most likely not on the team that made all of the "official" pastebins. You can probably look at her contribution as coming from a runner than coming from a (more influential) mod
In 41 completed games, I was part of 19. The percentage there is ~46%, but I won't nitpick you for stating 48%.
In the 19 games that I was in, her record was 15-4. This is a 79% win-rate, so you're also right.
In the 22 games that I wasn't part of, her record was 18-4. This is an 82% win-rate.
In her entire 41 games, her record was 33-8. This is 80.5% win-rate. The win rate that she had with me was actually slightly lower than the win rate that she had without me, and in line with her overall win rate for the round.
I don't think I have to get into hypothesis testing and p-value analysis to show you that the likelihood, just based on the numbers, of foul play between us is the same as the likelihood of foul play between her and anyone else that she played with.
2
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
runners have a right to put forward their opinion just like everyone else, dude.
if she thought something fishy was going on she should have let the other mods look into it. i feel like if you're in the top 3 as a mod you have a moral obligation to not interfere with the round even if you think you're doing the right thing because you aren't coming into it from a third party perspective, but everything is different now
Round 446 cheating/throws.
Poll
