Round 725 Discussion Thread!

deleteddeletedover 8 years ago

Congrats to all three winners of Round 723!


1st

Setups:

  • TBD
  • TBD

2nd

Setups:


3rd

Setups:


Good luck to the participants of Round 725!

Join the competition!

Poll
You are standing by train tracks. A train is heading towards 5 people on the tracks. If you pull a lever, the train will switch to another track with only 1 person on it. Which would you do?
Pull it, leading 1 person to die.51%22
Do nothing, letting 5 people die.48%21
MisterPresidentover 8 years ago
That shouldn't be on the player, imo. It's literally the biggest flaw of having a 3rd party. No 3rd party setups should be comped for that reason. If you don't want the player to have the ability to choose who wins, then stop comping it.
denialover 8 years ago
its a balancing method for a 3 faction setup

a player shouldn't be able to choose who gets to win at that junction of the game

you can argue that the threat becomes meaningless because hes obligated to vote nl at the end of the day. its the only action that isn't gamethrowing and that in effect town is essentially in autoloss, but thats fine because forcing town to not be able to choose who gets to win the game is a favorable outcome
2
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
Wajjj
bye
no he isn't allowed to, but he can wait until the other scum votes and say "i'll vote him with you" or something.
But surely the other scum knows that once he crosses his 'partner', that the agent would have to vote NL or else be kingmaking again, and even if he does decide to do that with the knowledge that agent's going to vote NL you're left with the problem of intention broadcasting...

Just seems to me that the only options agent has are to make threats that, after putting a bit of thought into them, have to be completely empty.
you're right they do have to be empty but they have the opportunity to convince scum to nl (which can work if they're bad) and that's what gives them a chance to get out of autoloss

it's really not a hard concept that a miniscule chance of messing up mafia so you get out of autoloss > 0 chance of getting out of autoloss
Wajjjover 8 years agoedited
bye
no he isn't allowed to, but he can wait until the other scum votes and say "i'll vote him with you" or something.
But surely the other scum knows that once he crosses his 'partner', that the agent would have to vote NL or else be kingmaking again, and even if he does decide to do that with the knowledge that agent's going to vote NL you're left with the problem of intention broadcasting...

Just seems to me that the only options agent has are to make threats that, after putting a bit of thought into them, have to be completely empty.
BeepBeepLettuceover 8 years ago
Someone should comp suppa magical so 3rd party has to take a side.

Or comp Feels Good Man
BeepBeepLettuceover 8 years ago
ling
who r u
Someone annoying
1
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
Wajjj
Anyway, allow me beating a dead horse, but what if I as killer in 3 way with spy and agent decide to wait until kicks to vote the agent.

I vote and instantly kick, is agent still allowed to cross me?
Cos if he isn't, then he really genuinely is in autoloss from the start.
And if he is, then isn't that technically a loophole that allows him to kingmake/GT?
no he isn't allowed to, but he can wait until the other scum votes and say "i'll vote him with you" or something. if you kicked there would've only been 15 seconds left so the other scum would have to vote eventually
TelluriumNitrogenover 8 years ago
This is why we don't comp manhunt
2
Wajjjover 8 years ago
Anyway, allow me beating a dead horse, but what if I as killer in 3 way with spy and agent decide to wait until kicks to vote the agent.

I vote and instantly kick, is agent still allowed to cross me?
Cos if he isn't, then he really genuinely is in autoloss from the start.
And if he is, then isn't that technically a loophole that allows him to kingmake/GT?
Edarkover 8 years ago
ling
literally every name i recognize is someone annoying WOW
stfU
lingover 8 years ago
who r u
BeepBeepLettuceover 8 years ago
hey ling
lingover 8 years ago
literally every name i recognize is someone annoying WOW
Zhuorbover 8 years ago
LMFAO WHO DID THIS??? XD
ivanaover 8 years ago
Highlight of the round: Somene nl'ing with me as naked mafia. That. Was. The. BEST! lmfao
deleteddeletedover 8 years agoedited
highlight of the round

2
MisterPresidentover 8 years ago
"Huh. I can't believe that you people actually CARE about this game, still. I am an intellectual and have moved onto more difficult games, like online chess."
Voltaover 8 years ago
MisterPresident
Showboat
i cant believe you nerds are still having legitimate debates and discussions about an internet corpse.
Yet here you are, still posting on this "internet corpse," dingus
>this game sucks you're all losers

>yeah but you're commenting here so you're a loser too

how to win everything
MisterPresidentover 8 years ago
Showboat
i cant believe you nerds are still having legitimate debates and discussions about an internet corpse.
Yet here you are, still posting on this "internet corpse," dingus
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
i cant believe you nerds are still having legitimate debates and discussions about an internet corpse.
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
ban peanut too!
PeanutMarmadukeover 8 years ago
don't
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
MisterPresident
Moderators - Please do the open competitive reports about CoalDragon right now. He is an obvious troll that is screwing around in the games he joins.

Thanks
please
MisterPresidentover 8 years ago
Moderators - Please do the open competitive reports about CoalDragon right now. He is an obvious troll that is screwing around in the games he joins.

Thanks
10
PeanutMarmadukeover 8 years ago
MisterPresident
I love being blasted by an entire table for being antitown when I said I didn't want to guilty test D1 in Jan 2.0
if u cant beatem, lynchem