GUy,s This is the First Time i will Upvote Connor in my Entire Life, im going SHivv-mode right now
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Jesus Christ
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
I never stated people should "ignore" them because, well, statistically speaking it'd make sense for a former cheater to do it again. Like you'd expect a 2 time GTer to GT again, yet you look into proper evidence before instantly ruling on them.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
I'm battering away at my keyboard at a rate of knots
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
dont plus a post that uses the r-word thanjks
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
i wish i had a giant sign i could wear around my neck saying 'i am not a cheating mod' when such issues come across
i skimmed the pastebin, darkbot/laser are condemning but i've had people tell me that they could just be abc accounts but it's a postulating theory that i dont really care to delve into
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
That's what I'm saying - don't ignore it, just don't go solely off of it.
tl;dr there's nothing wrong with assuming a cheater who cheated before then got unbanned cheated again, but banning them based off of that assumption alone is unequivocally r-word
Jackhammer are you saying that I should ignore a trend that has gone on for about four years now that strongly suggests that a former cheater is likely to cheat a second time? If I was a mod you know what I'd do, but I'm not a mod anymore so I'm saying what I think happened since I cbf to read entire pastebins. When I was a mod I wasn't wrong a single time when doing cheating reports, I know about the process. But to ignore the trend of former cheaters cheating again is silly in my opinion
Should we use it as evidence for a ban? No, that would be really stupid but ignoring it completely is dumb as well
If the probability based on previous cases is above 50%, then the statistical assumption for people who can't be bothered to read games to make is indeed to assume guilt, though, Basil.
