So there's been a lot of shooting recently and the president isnt doing about it.
Australia had its worst mass shooting in 1996 on the 28th of April. 12 days later australia announced a bipartisan deal on sweeping gun control measures. The government brought back and destroyed over a million guns. We (australia) haven't had a mass shooting since.
Why is Trump not doing anything. Children are dying. People aren't living their full lives. If comforting those who have been through trauma and lost loved ones is all they can do b*llfucking sh*t. If saying it will be okay to those victims then saying that to gun owners should be fine too.
Sorry im just annoyed with how this has all been going down.
Sure, we (the United States Of America) produce the most guns in the world, we have one gun per citizen .. but the guns can’t be the problem , it’s gotta be the crazies !!! And the Mexicans
rip world. we can't seem to stop anything because "underground" networks are getting too big, and law enforcement can't stop illegal stuff from happening nowadays
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
History repeats itself. You know who removed guns entirely? Hitler. Stalin.
I do agree that nobody needs an assault rifle. Being allowed to own one as long as it's semi-automatic is just stupid. They can be removed as a whole, sorry to all of the gun enthusiasts.
As for handguns (and MAYBE hunting rifles,) we can't do anything about that. There are a lot of people out there who live in isolated/rural areas without a cop precinct 10 minutes away. You're screwed if some dudes run up on you
Btw, despite everything, if a man wants an assault rifle, he'll get an assault rifle.
this really sucks, because I came back from NJROTC Orienteering Nationals last night, and they were held in Apopka Florida, just north of Orlando. There were 5 schools from Florida actually competing in the event. all I heard about while watching the news in the hotel was how sad it all was and the lives lost.
there should be more restrictive gun trading laws that requires a straight up background check and mental health check.
What I'm asking is why are they following the same rule from 1791 when it's clear that the types of weapons from then to now have drastically changed
Many people for whatever reason don't believe the rule needs to be changed or reworded to at least exclude certain arms, even in light of all the mass shootings that have happened. I say that's absolutely moronic
the evidence is overwhelming, they need to get rid of their guns or better regulate them and their buyers. at least the fullautos and that attachment for the semis which make it a full
also dont give me that second amendment bs. you think the founding fathers knew fully automatic guns would exist when they wrote it? i'm sorry but it's such a stupid argument to say they shouldn't do anything because of the second amendment; clearly they need to AMEND it in a way for the types of guns i iisted above (and possibly others) to be banned
after every mass shooting the govt. talks about it for like three days and dont do sh*t. shows you how much they care
it was a school disciplinary problem saying that no casualities would have happened had the student been taken care of beforehand when problems had arose the first time
Poll
