i come for the sjw fighting i stay for the greek history lessons
deletedalmost 9 years
I mean I sometimes value my life, and I value the life of Izzy above mine or any of yours, but that's just my subjective opinion.
lmao josh cmon
deletedalmost 9 years
i'd go for better tackling what casues and what could be done to alleviate racial tension, but honestly i'm getting bored af of posting on here lol
deletedalmost 9 years
the notion that there exists a genetic predisposition to crime is utterly ludicrous. it's simply not viable as per evolution. just in case anyone was wondering
and as to harrold's earlier comment about same-race whatever: white germans literally tortured and killed six million white jews
Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 12 percent of the population. But as MacDonald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties.
"Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald.
MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population.
"The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods."
That proves the point? Unless you think some race are somehow "inherently predisposed" to committing crime which is well, by definition, racist. The only rational explanation would be that poverty and discrimination and the culture that develops around it are the things responsible for what's happening to blacks right now.
deletedalmost 9 years
things got bad after socrates shoved his fat nose in it all
deletedalmost 9 years
Interestingly though the Platonic dialogues shaped Neoplatonism and Neoplatonism had major influence to varying degrees on most of the Abrahamic religions, although many of the more extreme examples got wiped out (Gnostics, lmao.)
deletedalmost 9 years
Also screw PLATO
deletedalmost 9 years
Well yeh who wants to be like the people you're crushing under your boot heel anyway?
deletedalmost 9 years
Yeh but Roman and Greek religion are fairly identical, and I assume have similar origin myths, in the dominant Greek tradition Prometheus(Same name in both traditions) does in fact shape man from clay, but life is breathed into the clay by Athena(Roman name Minerva.)
Tbh I don't know enough about Greco-Roman religion though.
I think because it ends with the gendered "man" despite the fact that the sense of it being a "male" rather than "a person" didn't come until like, the 13th century in Old English, and actually etymologically speaking the -man ending probably doesn't even relate to that because the word human comes down from Latin humanus which probably has no relation, and literally just means "of man, people"
womxn
never mind that post womxn is an actual thing lmao
deletedalmost 9 years
In fact I looked it up and humanus comes from humus which means soil, so we have the idea here of humans being of dust basically, and it's not remotely gendered.
I think because it ends with the gendered "man" despite the fact that the sense of it being a "male" rather than "a person" didn't come until like, the 13th century in Old English, and actually etymologically speaking the -man ending probably doesn't even relate to that because the word human comes down from Latin humanus which probably has no relation, and literally just means "of man, people"
womxn
deletedalmost 9 years
I think because it ends with the gendered "man" despite the fact that the sense of it being a "male" rather than "a person" didn't come until like, the 13th century in Old English, and actually etymologically speaking the -man ending probably doesn't even relate to that because the word human comes down from Latin humanus which probably has no relation, and literally just means "of man, people"
The twice as many whites as blacks argument is so stupid. The black population in America is about 12%, whereas the white population is around 77%. Even if the # of whites killed is double, the amount is still disproportionate. My assumption to why it is disproportionate is simply because there usually is more minorities living in poverty, which is mostly where gun violence happens.
Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 12 percent of the population. But as MacDonald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties.
"Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald.
MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population.
"The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods."
can i just say that macdonald is a really american name
The twice as many whites as blacks argument is so stupid. The black population in America is about 12%, whereas the white population is around 77%. Even if the # of whites killed is double, the amount is still disproportionate. My assumption to why it is disproportionate is simply because there usually is more minorities living in poverty, which is mostly where gun violence happens.
Some may argue that these statistics are evidence of racist treatment toward blacks, since whites consist of 62 percent of the population and blacks make up 12 percent of the population. But as MacDonald writes in The Wall Street Journal, 2009 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties.
"Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force," writes MacDonald.
MacDonald also pointed out in her Hillsdale speech that blacks "commit 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, and 66 percent of all violent crime" in New York City, even though they consist of 23 percent of the city's population.
"The black violent crime rate would actually predict that more than 26 percent of police victims would be black," MacDonald said. "Officer use of force will occur where the police interact most often with violent criminals, armed suspects, and those resisting arrest, and that is in black neighborhoods."
From one of the leaders of Black Lives Matter Toronto:
Now obviously she doesn't speak for all BLM activists, but the fact that someone who believes this can lead one of their chapters does not look good for the movement as a whole in my opinion.
why is this person incapable of using the word 'human'
deletedalmost 9 years
garyoak, my man
deletedalmost 9 years
Anyway I think it's kind of stupid to utter "ALL LIVES MATTER" at a black lives matter protest or over their posts because they're attempting to make a point that their lives matter as much as any other human life and not that other life is somehow unimportant or irrelevant and you're sort of being a douche if you're white because by virtue of hundreds of years of western history you are in fact, historically speaking, the only life that has true value based upon the subjective valuation of the masses of white voices. I think though if you wanna try to construct your own platform independent of theirs though based on the conceptual idea that "all life matters" then go ahead.
To be honest the fact humans can give value to otherwise valueless things makes existence both fun and tiresome at the same time.