Back to Off Topic

Serious Thread (whoaaaa)

about 10 years

With all the coverage on TV and online recently, I just wanted to ask you guys a question - would you date a transgender person? Reasoning is cool, saying yes or no is cool, just don't put any dumb in the comments

Yea or naw?
39
No
24
Yes
7
I'm not sure
3
Only if they were a perfect 10
about 10 years

Devante says

i wouldn't date tumblr activists


Me neither.
about 10 years
i wouldn't date tumblr activists
about 10 years

Devante says

so then all people who are homosexual, and claim to only be able to date their own s3x would also date someone from the opposite s3x?


Yep, sure.
about 10 years

Escurai says

I don't get this "conflict" you're talking about :|


Ignore me I'm lashing out at certain Tumblrites that presented me with what I'm telling you a few years ago when I brought up the same issue.
about 10 years

Edark says


Peta says

But I can't accept the idea that (a) there is not a single person of your gender whom you'd date and (b) it's actually impossible as a matter of theory for there to exist someone of your gender whom you'd date.


Why cant you accept these 2 ideas? Are you just making some sort of probability argument or are you arguing that heterosexuality is a choice?


I'm saying that gender is a glorified deal breaker. It's a big enough deal for people to use labels like gay/straight/bi/whatever, whereas we lack concise labels for "dater only of non-tattooed people" or "dater only of people with a college degree," but really the matter of whether or not you'd date someone of a certain gender falls under the same umbrella category as these things. And I probably can't prove it, but I think it's the human condition to discover and reserve exceptions, for oneself, to all deal breakers. I used to loathe tattoos because I was raised by WASP-y Americans. Then I met someone with tattoos and I realized that that's a ridiculous reason to rule out someone to whom you're really attracted. Obviously gender preference is a much bigger deal than tattoos, it's genetically ingrained, etc., but I don't see any reason to think it's set in stone. Heterosexuality isn't a choice, but it's also not an immutable law.
about 10 years
I dont get how you can argue that a) Homosexuality isnt a choice while also saying that b) you're transphobic if you're certain that you will never date a transperson due to their physical differences of the real deal
about 10 years

Uranus says

Wait so you're saying people who would decline to date a transgender person are transphobic?


Ask Strider, I didn't make the rule.
about 10 years
I don't get this "conflict" you're talking about :|
about 10 years

UniversalStudios says


Escurai says

People can agree with the choice to change gender without necessarily wanting that in their own relationships


There is a conflict here, you're just not willing to acknowledge it.


Wait so you're saying people who would decline to date a transgender person are transphobic?
about 10 years

UniversalStudios says


Escurai says

People can agree with the choice to change gender without necessarily wanting that in their own relationships


There is a conflict here, you're just not willing to acknowledge it.


there isn't one, don't be dumb
about 10 years
about 10 years
I date because ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
about 10 years

Escurai says

People can agree with the choice to change gender without necessarily wanting that in their own relationships


There is a conflict here, you're just not willing to acknowledge it.
about 10 years

Peta says


Edark says


Peta says

You can logically reduce the question to "Would you decline to date someone you'd otherwise want to date due to some such attribute about which you may or may not harbor (subdued) phobic thoughts?" and anyone who says yes is a giant jerk.


Well this question implies that the person have undergone surgery I assume?



Nah.

I couldn't care less if you call yourself straight - I do - but I really think that the label of heterosexuality means that you're generally - even 99.99999% of the time, but NOT universally - attracted to women, not men. But I can't accept the idea that (a) there is not a single person of your gender whom you'd date and (b) it's actually impossible as a matter of theory for there to exist someone of your gender whom you'd date.


so then all people who are homosexual, and claim to only be able to date their own s3x would also date someone from the opposite s3x?

or does this theory only fit to those who claim to be straight
about 10 years

Peta says



If you only date for marriage then you're kinda weird. If you say you date for the purpose of reproduction then you're just lying.


what
about 10 years

UniversalStudios says

Then the question is "why wouldn't you want to date a transexual" and the answer conflict with "agreeing with transexual lifestyle".


People can agree with the choice to change gender without necessarily wanting that in their own relationships
about 10 years
So does that homosexual moderator trolling this thread in order to make sure no transexuals are harmed in the posts.
about 10 years

Peta says

But I can't accept the idea that (a) there is not a single person of your gender whom you'd date and (b) it's actually impossible as a matter of theory for there to exist someone of your gender whom you'd date.


Why cant you accept these 2 ideas? Are you just making some sort of probability argument or are you arguing that heterosexuality is a choice?
about 10 years

UniversalStudios says


Peta says

(a) there is not a single person of your gender whom you'd date and (b) it's actually impossible as a matter of theory for there to exist someone of your gender whom you'd date.


Communion doesn't have to be sexual.


I agree!
about 10 years

Peta says

(a) there is not a single person of your gender whom you'd date and (b) it's actually impossible as a matter of theory for there to exist someone of your gender whom you'd date.


Communion doesn't have to be sexual.
about 10 years
lol
about 10 years
It's called celibacy.
about 10 years

UniversalStudios says


Peta says

You can logically reduce the question to "Would you decline to date someone you'd otherwise want to date due to some such attribute about which you may or may not harbor (subdued) phobic thoughts?" and anyone who says yes is a giant jerk.


As someone that plans to marry the next person he has sex with this is unequivocally false because being able to reproduce is a key factor in being a female.


You plan to marry the next person you have sex with?
about 10 years

Edark says


Peta says

You can logically reduce the question to "Would you decline to date someone you'd otherwise want to date due to some such attribute about which you may or may not harbor (subdued) phobic thoughts?" and anyone who says yes is a giant jerk.


Well this question implies that the person have undergone surgery I assume?



Nah.

I couldn't care less if you call yourself straight - I do - but I really think that the label of heterosexuality means that you're generally - even 99.99999% of the time, but NOT universally - attracted to women, not men. But I can't accept the idea that (a) there is not a single person of your gender whom you'd date and (b) it's actually impossible as a matter of theory for there to exist someone of your gender whom you'd date.
about 10 years

Escurai says

Not wanting to date someone and not agreeing with the transsexual lifestyle are two very different things


Then the question is "why wouldn't you want to date a transexual" and the answer conflict with "agreeing with transexual lifestyle".