It is an utter disgrace that Anonymous setups have been banned from comp. The unprofessional manner it has been dealt with, makes it even more shocking. Anonymous setups have been banned mid-round without an explanation? (They are not popular is not a reason btw).
I know for a fact that several mods and perhaps admins are not on board with this ban. Heck, Lucid himself has said that he has no problems with anonymous setups in comp. I can point to many rounds of the past where anonymous setups have been played with no issue (pre DUFF era.)
I worked bloody hard to trophy and I want to be allowed to comp the setups I choose. 3 of my setups were removed for a variety of made up reasons. This one is by far the most ridiculous. I want a full explanation of why anon setups are banned.
If your argument is solely against the recent surge of DUFFS setups , I wish to pose you a question. Is it our fault that weve won a lot of trophies recently and want to comp these setups? This is a joke.
Anon setups actually allow for a less biased comp game without the use of meta and ogi.
Please give me more than a one line response. I want the name of whoever decided this. Answer for yourself.
imo towns win more often than not because its a lot harder to maintain lies, it's a lot more difficult to feign emotions for a prolonged period of time, and its a lot more difficult to fabricate a thought process as mafia.
not to mention that most players put more effort into developing their town-game simply because you flip town more often than mafia. It's also beneficial to their overall winrate to have a reputation for being honest than one of being deceitful.
If people would take anon setups seriously, I think that it would be great to have them in comp. But if you look at all past DUFFS anon setups played in comp, you can see that people don't take them seriously.
it's only because of the community's shift in values. See this as an attempt to rekindle the interest!
As the same set of players play together over and over, the game gradually becomes more and more town-sided.
The benefit of anonymous setups is that it helps to balance out the alignment wins by removing meta.
That is: Someone's win-rate (mafia winrate in particular) Their experience And any unique alignment tells they may have
In my opinion, it is great that anonymous setups are allowed to be played competitively.
and for those arguing that it allows experienced players to fake dumbtelling - dumbtelling is a strategy lol
I don't like these arguments really at all, because mafia can combat meta in different ways, and a lot of the reasons for setups becoming more townsided is that it takes more time to develop an optimal town strategy than a mafia strategy in most cases and that once people become comfortable with a setup, the setup will start to be more townsided than originally, which makes the meta argument slightly skewed.
If people would take anon setups seriously, I think that it would be great to have them in comp. But if you look at all past DUFFS anon setups played in comp, you can see that people don't take them seriously.