Competition in biology, ecology, and sociology, is a contest between organisms, animals, individuals, groups, etc., for territory, a niche, or a location of resources, for resources and goods, mates, for prestige, recognition, awards, or group or social status, for leadership. ?????????
what?????
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
logik's pretty justified in being po'd tbh. well besides that bearguru's ploy blew up in his face lol
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
no one right now. i'm backing out for the night after getting ignored in two games straight. an ego this deserved needs to be listened to
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
what???
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
perhaps that bearguru subbed in a bunch of dudes with trophies to finish his round against a bunch of noobs
its true in this sense that a trophy won by multiple players on an account isn't going to represent the skill level of the account's owner
it's also true that the competition isn't made to determine who's best
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Yeah I'll give you that, the sub-in in his analogy was fresh meaning he had an advantage which isn't the case with BearGuru's subs they just all have big egos lol. however to pretend that you didn't understand what he's saying is just ignorant
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Connor
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
are you asserting that all players are equal. furthermore, are you asserting that players exist who are not below me?
deleteddeletedover 11 years agoedited
but he could've, if his parents took away his racquet.
you're still not establishing why this is unfair, or worth caring about
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
my parents took away my computer, animegayboy69 come play my hearts for me :^)
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
the only difference is that the hypothetical situation the sub-in has a clear advantage, which apparently makes it completely "nonsensical" as opposed to just, not-that-good
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Even if I did play tennis, it doesn't mean I'm being elitist by pointing out that the analogy is completely absurd.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
I could literally make an analogy about being in a pie eating contest however you have your friend come in mid contest because you get a phone call that your wife is in labour and he finishes the contest and wins..
i'm very elitist, about my internet mafia hobby. i try to act superior to those who make nonsensical analogies
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
You can try to be condescending however you're both wrong lol
(Steven and the anime guy)
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
it doesn't need to be changed to a chess tournament. The similarities is the fact that you have someone else winning a competition and you're still getting the fame.
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
the point is still made and the analogy is still understood despite your elitism about your hobbies
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
just change it to a chess tournament
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Analogies imply that there's at least some semblance of a similarity between the things being compared, which is clearly not the case when comparing internet mafia to tennis.
