Uncc'd orc and cop, outed doc cc with different saves. D1 - convincing town to lynch outside doc cc and saves - ~10,5 minutes D2 - convincing town to NL to force mafia into turning from mylo to lylo - ~9 minutes D3 - convincing town to get votes off me - ~10 minutes D4 - convincing town to lynch the confirmed mafia - ~5,5 minutes
lol I made a joke on an appeal where someone claimed mod abuse for having an unreasonably high suicide rate
Given that I do all these reports per week, and it wastes my time to deal with stupid ones like that, I'll make all the jokes I bloody want on them
The vio is not deleted when they go below 15, because the 1st vio for repeated suicides is a warning. The second vio is a ban, so if we delete the first one, how would someone ever get banned for consistently ruining your games pranay??
Hmmmm I think your critical thinking skills are lacking
I think we have had enough of this bad mod bsm who i thought could get better because he is active. But he is just too inexperienced and bad to do things properly. He just can't put his personal bias regarding situations aside. He doesn't want to follow rules. Joking about stuff is more important to him than keeping things clear for the users. This guy thinks he is more important than the users when his job is to solve problems of the users. Just because he is a mod we have to deal with him daily.
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
I doubt you can ever say that i dont think critically. It is you who assumes that all players are supposed to do all the research instead of raising concerns to the right person. I am not a mod. I am not the one giving him the vio. It is your job to clarify. Your earlier argument was that i should trust you had good reason to ban someone. And you are saying one mod doesn't know what other does but expect users to assume you are always right when most of the times you are hilariously wrong.
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
That is your job. All you had to do was write down the proper judgement. But you just had to he a dik and others are supposed to do research and make assumptions to justify your actions. Shame on you. Shame on you for continuing to argue when you are shown how stupid you are.
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
And instead of writing in the report that he is too close and should get a vio, you have to write that he got the vio when it was 15. And isntead of arguing like a dummy just admit that you didn't do your job properly.
Moreover when someone gets a vio for repeated suicides then the user is asked to keep it below 15. And the vio is removed when it is fixed. Instead you sustained the report saying he is too close. Implying people are not allowed to play games without vegging to bring down sui rate.
By your logic you should give him another vio while someone is above 15 so they get banned instead of asking them to bring the sui rate down.
Six years on this website and ten thousand games of mafia and you still can't think about a problem critically
You seem to think all the mods know what other mods are doing too, or that we have secret information tools
Actually, we just look at the reports/player stats and figure out things with our brains because we use them!
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
No. Not at all. No one is supposed to do data analysis based on assumptions that you did your job right. If there is a discrepancy the person will ask you for clarification instead of doing data analysis. Fuking idiot.
Poll
