u dont understand basic ideas of marxism leninsm tho, u dont understand that there r anarcho commies that were murdered in the ussr, and leftcom, orthodox marxists who 2 went to the gulags

projectmatt

Sims

out of the 5 modern communist countries, would you not say their governments control everything?

mccarthy 2020

i mean from a technical definition, if those countries control everything, then they aren't a fully implemented communist society. it's supposed to have public ownership and no state.

you could argue that -attempting- communism inherently leads to government control, though

This has been my argument the whole time... Then you attack me for not understanding what communism is.

Sims

out of the 5 modern communist countries, would you not say their governments control everything?

mccarthy 2020

i mean from a technical definition, if those countries control everything, then they aren't a fully implemented communist society. it's supposed to have public ownership and no state.

you could argue that -attempting- communism inherently leads to government control, though

>calls everyone triggered snowflakes
>all woman screening of wonder woman
>*triggereing intensifies*

out of the 5 modern communist countries, would you not say their governments control everything?

mccarthy 2020

Sims

i miss the 50s when communism was synonymous with evil

i 2 miss rapid racism and misogony those were the good times huh

i miss the 50s when communism was synonymous with evil

i miss the 50s when communism was synonymous with evil

projectmatt

GentIeman

You are beyond saving. You haven't said anything or even tried to debate me. All you have said is just read about communism and you'll see how it works.

That's because I'm not trying to have a serious debate with you. I'm asking you to read the actual theory on the topic of Communism, because if you want to have a debate about it, it's important that you know what you're talking about, and you clearly showed that you don't know even the dictionary definition of communism.

There's a lot of responses to the argument that society can't grow without a hierarchy - primarily, I don't think that's a particularly strong argument because it's based on "it's never happened before, so it can't work now" instead of something that inherently makes it impossible to happen. I think society can absolutely advance in a scenario like that, but it depends how you're defining "advance", since it's a vague word.

I said the literal definition never work because the coalition who put in place will never step down. Power has to go to somebody to put this into place; they will never step down. Ever. I have said that multiple times.
?

u think social democracy is socialism

@Gentleman
>quotes einsten
>thinks socialist r stupid
???