Even if you want to go with the uptick of fascism and white nationalism. Attacking them doesn't help your cause. All it does is give them more ammunition to say, "look how crazy the left has become".
One of the funny things is you guys fail to do is understand correlation vs causation. "After Trump won the white house, hate crimes raised."
This could also do with the fact with the high increase of terrorism in western countries in the last few years. Saying that its the west's fault for not being inclusive enough and that we should all just come together. Then terrorism will stop; Is extremely naive and counter intuitive.
I'm not saying that hate crimes of any sort should ever happen, they shouldn't, nor should certain people be barred from entering. But the liberal apology tour for other groups and just blaming the west and white people, is part of the cause for the rise of "white nationalism".
For the liberals having such a high college graduate segment, it's really sad how naive their world view is.
u think fcking anarchists or even libertarian socialist give a damn about the borders some europeans draw on a map, and that if they dont take the whole syria they r not real, and that is just
"It can't happen without overthrowing the government. What part of this are you not comprehending?" THATS JUST NOT TRUE ROJAVA IS THE DE FACTO RULER OF NORTHERN SYRIA AND IT DOESNT WANT OVERTHROW DAMASCUS
Where was this ever implied? If it lasts for more then 10 years, then it will be stuck the same little shithole and never will expand if it keeps its ideology.
and sureeeee u may dont care about those peoples, cause they belive in things u think r utopians they deserve to die, but goddamn it i f*cking care and i wont let u fcking spit on their graves
It can't happen without overthrowing the government. What part of this are you not comprehending? Some little shithole in syria isn't an example of it working.
out of the 5 modern communist countries, would you not say their governments control everything?
mccarthy 2020
i mean from a technical definition, if those countries control everything, then they aren't a fully implemented communist society. it's supposed to have public ownership and no state.
you could argue that -attempting- communism inherently leads to government control, though
This has been my argument the whole time... Then you attack me for not understanding what communism is.
no, i attacked you for defining communism in a way that was not accurate at all. if you actually did understand it this whole time, it really did not look like it.
You were attacking quotes of me making fun of it at its extreme ends. This is how communist regime happens. 1. People revolt 2. A coalition is formed 3. Coalition over throws government 4. Coalition is trusted to step down 5. Coalition never steps down
The idea that the state will ever secede all their power to the people without being overthrown is just stupid.