There needs to be a system in place that would allow mods to be properly measured in there ability to handle reports fairly and properly. I very much doubt that there is some one who consistently looks over every report and evaluates if mods are making the correct verdicts.
Why not implement a way to allow the community to "vote" on the end report verdicts and let the players decide if they believe the decision is fair or not. This would prevent any sort of mod abuse and allows the people who run the site an easy way to evaluate wether or not the mods are doing there job well. This also would be helpful for mods in the appeal process, as mods would be able to read the results and if the overwhelming majority of people believe the verdict given was incorrect, they know that the report needs to be reassessed.
One possible way to do this would be to implement a poll after a report decision has been made. Mods would still have the ultimate power in the final decision, but at least this way we give the community an easy route to help improve and monitor the site.
He literally didn't "admit 10% of verdicts are wrong", for starters he was talking about AFTER a mistake was made, maybe 10% of the time it's not fixed. So 99% of reports are mistake-free. Of that 1% maybe 10% (Rutab's generous number) are not fixed. That's not 10% of reports being wrong. That's 0.1% of reports that went wrong not being fixed.
Reverse you need to take a break. The poor horse is ground meat at this point, please stop beating it.
deleteddeletedover 9 years ago
ok but i want links, i can look at the reports.
otherwise i can say you killed michael jackson without proof
I showed two examples of proof firstly he admitted to 10% of verdicts being wrong, then he backtracked and made up an excuse instead of admitting fault, hes a mod so hes a person who would look at ur reports.
deleteddeletedover 9 years agoedited
aight Im out. this is where you slowly realize that an argument only exists if there is someone to argue against. Have fun as this thread slowly creeps into obscurity. Im sure youll be back next week though with some user moderation idea a la what youtube recently did.
So hes making up numbers to try and prove his point, and then backtracks trying to cover his instead of admitting his fault. Kind of what happens during reports...
A moderator already acknowledged that 10% of verdicts are wrong, why should he have to go through any extra effort when the conclusion has already been made.
deleteddeletedover 9 years ago
show me a complaint thread where nothing was done, where the mod unequivocally gave the wrong verdict.
That should be pretty easy to do based off the tone of this thread
Poll
