i've used the "i could cheat and probably get away with it on reputation alone" card too much to actually successfully do it, which is a shame since i would enjoy giving roshiez her first silver
Slowbro, I could have chosen anybody for the reaction test but the most effective reaction test is the one that has a possible reason behind it.
If i had just voted you for the entire day, would it be as effective? No.
if i had voted tangent for the entire day, would it be as effective? No.
But what matters is that at the end, I unvoted him and clearly stated that it was a reaction test and i corroborated my statement the next day by refusing to lynch Aesop because of his reaction DESPITE his unwillingness to lynch obvious maf.
yup from now on anyone that votes anyone right away without taking the vote off can be considered a grudgelynch.
anyone who hammers maf as town and then fosses 2nd maf at the end of the day will be considered as playing agains their win condition.
a town who votes obvious town even though the town unvoted him with the phrase "nope im keeping this vote on you and i want you to lose" or something to that effect, refuses to vote maf next day, then vegs when maf is about to get lynched is not considered gt.
