all right, i don't get it. cya later zovea
Hibiki UniversalStudios That doesn't invalidate the conclusion he reached based on what HE (Devante) was responding to, i.e. ablest. You need to breath deeply and approach this conversation without being A) ablest or B) hypocritical in the things you claim to believe in.
You're failing to comprehend that someone being wrong isn't an excuse to be ablest, something you claim to represent.
This thread is mostly just for Riddler.
Maybe 5 I don't really remember
The joke was alive 4 years ago.
Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. You understand it better, but then the frog is dead
ScubaSteve The "r word" specifically targets people based on an actual mental or physical disability, rather than their inability to string together a logical thought process. I'm sorry, find me one instance of this happening with anyone that uses it as part of their play.
Or is there an actual demographic of mentally insufficient players that need to be protected? If there is then I've been looking at the problem of this site all wrong.
Zhuorb Mikami is the artistic individual in the video I watched the video, I don't know who to reference on EM though.
Devante justrec i too, have no idea who mikami is. i keep picturing riotkiller Hahahaha I'm dying. Poor Mika.
Mostly just an artistic dude
Also the first guy to hack epicmafia
from what i just learned apparently he's the king of more than just epicmafia
Also the self proclaimed king of epicmafia
Mikami is the artistic individual in the video
i spaced it out for you in case you don't understand
mist giga pls help im still the new kid on the block ask me on Skype and i will tell you, maybe
i too, have no idea who mikami is. i keep picturing riotkiller
giga pls help im still the new kid on the block
UniversalStudios That doesn't invalidate the conclusion he reached based on what HE (Devante) was responding to, i.e. ablest. the conclusion that "x was responding to y" was wrong, because x was responding to z.
i was telling devante he was stupid for thinking that x was responding to y.
that's what that whole exchange was.
you are being stupid right now, for thinking that i was calling devante stupid for something that wasn't "devante thinking x was responding to y"
