← Back to Epicmafia

Should hip-firing be GT?

GrudgeVoteover 11 years ago

This is not a complaint thread.

No mods have been injured in the making of this thread.

Parental discretion advised: contains gun violence.

I originally filed an appeal against Mist, mistakenly believing that hip-firing being GT was the precedent ruling. I had this mistaken assumption because the last time I was active on this site, that was the case.

It is now clear that my actual appeal is against the current precedent. Mist was merely basing the verdict on current precedent, and has made no mistake in handling the original report

To me this seems like a very black/white scenario. Shooting a gun for the sake of shooting a gun is a clear indication that you do not care about the outcome of the game. If you cared about the outcome of the game, you would try to shoot in such a way that benefits town.

The current precedent treats hip-firing as trolling. Is there any merit in this? Is someone who randomly fires a gun trying to antagonize anyone, or is it that they do not care about winning?

Helsinki has taken the bold stand against the current precedent, and I imagine that moderators are discussing this among themselves before the next vote is cast.

Lets help them make the right decision. >>>>>>>>>

Poll
Should hip-firing (shooting with no reads) be considered Game-throwing?
Yes57%33
No42%24
57 votes
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
i honestly have no clue what side of the fence you're on with your posts connor, at first i thought you were agreeing with me, then i thought you were disagreeing with me so i've just been taking all your posts as opposition
SpiderBoomover 11 years ago
Sometimes you just have a feeling so you shoot so they don't try persuade you they're town.
I like it for the thrill and hope for the best lol.
Clairover 11 years ago
devante u just negged calvins post then negged me for disagreeing with him
3
Clairover 11 years agoedited
"intend to shoot mafia" and "intend to roll a dice" can't be the same thing
perekingover 11 years ago
Calvin
since GT is defined as playing against your win con, hipfiring may not be placed into that category even if it is shooting without having reads since your intention behind the shot is to shoot the mafia it can't be considered GT without more context indicating that it is.
Shooting/lynching randomly is playing against your win condition. If you shoot with no reads it can't be anything other than shooting randomly.
pompomover 11 years ago
Slow
pompom
Slow
vilden
no disrespect. but I honestly feel like I can place all epicmafiadotcom forum posters accurately in groups of 3 or 4, each group representing a certain style of posting
except me
my group is titled "tryhard dads"
haha, great one dude.
thanks pal.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
since GT is defined as playing against your win con, hipfiring may not be placed into that category even if it is shooting without having reads since your intention behind the shot is to shoot the mafia it can't be considered GT without more context indicating that it is.
7
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
pompom
Slow
vilden
no disrespect. but I honestly feel like I can place all epicmafiadotcom forum posters accurately in groups of 3 or 4, each group representing a certain style of posting
except me
my group is titled "tryhard dads"
haha, great one dude.
pompomover 11 years ago
Slow
vilden
no disrespect. but I honestly feel like I can place all epicmafiadotcom forum posters accurately in groups of 3 or 4, each group representing a certain style of posting
except me
my group is titled "tryhard dads"
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
vilden
no disrespect. but I honestly feel like I can place all epicmafiadotcom forum posters accurately in groups of 3 or 4, each group representing a certain style of posting
except me
pompomover 11 years ago
helsinki
Togepi
Renaldo
helsinki's idea is good.

i like hipfire as its own vio too. It takes intent out of the question and makes it about the action (like copied mechs)
Here you are coming in with the really good ideas 9 pages too late.
god bless bronto for coming up with that idea all on his own. what a swell guy.
who said I was taking credit? It's a good idea. Didn't we talk about this a few months ago already though? I remember it not gaining a lot of traction then.

Thankfully, user GrudgeVote has brought this to our attention.
vildenover 11 years ago
ahaha i think it could be a good thread, but i've got a massive headache
Satanover 11 years ago
i am in your group
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
vilden
no disrespect. but I honestly feel like I can place all epicmafiadotcom forum posters accurately in groups of 3 or 4, each group representing a certain style of posting
do it, i wanna know who is in my group.
vildenover 11 years ago
no disrespect. but I honestly feel like I can place all epicmafiadotcom forum posters accurately in groups of 3 or 4, each group representing a certain style of posting
Satanover 11 years ago
he didnt invite me to his wedding, what the heck
Orlyover 11 years agoedited
okay my job here is done, this thread is dead.

move along, people.
Orlyover 11 years agoedited
Satan
i hear pranay likes to make his wife-to-be fart in his face and he inhales it
first of all, the man is married.

second of all, that sounds perfectly normal for a married couple
Satanover 11 years ago
i hear pranay likes to make his wife-to-be fart in his face and he inhales it
vildenover 11 years ago
Orly
if i were to call pranay a cheater, i bet this thread would get interesting.

of course, hypothetically speaking. i would never actually call pranay a cheater.
what
Orlyover 11 years ago
Polo
I like u just fine, Orly?
oh ok, i rescind my previous statement.
Satanover 11 years ago
ban a&d

ban guns

ban everyone
Orlyover 11 years ago
if i were to call pranay a cheater, i bet this thread would get interesting.

of course, hypothetically speaking. i would never actually call pranay a cheater.
Poloover 11 years ago
I like u just fine, Orly?
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
Hibiki
are people turned off by the dice term? should i be rephrasing it in order to seem less wrong or hung up?
no i used that exact wording earlier when this was being discussed. it makes sense.