Lucid Please Read

Evolalmost 12 years ago

Randomizing (?) mafia order of actions was a bad idea. It seems now that mafia cannot strategize who leads on a kill, which makes it harder in many setups to play optimally and unfairly gives town an advantage, especially in setups containing bomb/watcher where mafia can easily get into autoloss. Please go back to first mafia to vote leads.

Example: https://epicmafia.com/game/3471828/review I vote second, get caught by watcher

Poll
Revert back to mafia being able to choose who leads instead of random.
Yes92%53
No7%4
Giga13almost 12 years ago
So much for lucid coming back last weekend
Orlyalmost 12 years agoedited
wtf? why was this added.. it ruins a ton of good setups... lucid cmon
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
just played an awful game where stalker lead and GF died instead zzzz
Evolalmost 12 years ago
PLEASE FIX THIS ITS KILLING MEEEEE
pantheroalmost 12 years ago
i wonder why was this even changed. it should always be the first visitor on the report. if it isnt then the whole point of mafia meeting is moot. and all the strategies are thrown out. i hope lucid gives a read to this. we need to revert back to the original
Clairalmost 12 years ago
TheShane
When the heck did runwithfire become mod.
on her own whim, as usual
TheShanealmost 12 years ago
When the heck did runwithfire become mod.
catbaealmost 12 years ago
catbae
also lucid please read: give me my tokens
runwithfirealmost 12 years agoedited
ark
I say we randomize role actions, e.g nilla can save, blue can explode and lynching last maf can count as a fool situation imo.

^ make this an unranked game option pls. This is more important
2
arkalmost 12 years ago
I say we randomize role actions, e.g nilla can save, blue can explode and lynching last maf can count as a fool situation imo.
14
Stevenalmost 12 years agoedited
Yeah there's no reason to add more luck based mechs to the game, especially considering all the setups made already were based on the previous way things worked.

It's how it happens in forum mafia (at least where I have played it). It wouldn't be as big of a deal if EM was made this way, but changing it now will make all setup statistics inaccurate.
Sammiealmost 12 years ago
400000
no LOLUMAD

as the example in the OP shows harrold voted first i voted second and there were no switching votes, also watcher had picked his target before mafia voted.
lmao thats not lolumad


anyways...

this is clearly not right. lucid polease change it back this is like one of the things that has been a part of the mechanics of the game since forever and i can't see why it would ever change
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
cos if u stalk then u get watched
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
Only noobs mech-test.
Evolalmost 12 years ago
also it's "choosing" ;)
Evolalmost 12 years ago
why would voting my stalker meeting first make me catchable by watcher if i'm voting second on the dead...it's never been like that
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
It's voting, dumbass.
Evolalmost 12 years ago
that's my stalker meeting noob
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
400000
no LOLUMAD

as the example in the OP shows harrold voted first i voted second and there were no switching votes, also watcher had picked his target before mafia voted.
Bioshock1990 votes Killnoone
400000 chooses williamhill
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
Kittenz was the hooker is now even more absurdly townsided.
catbaealmost 12 years ago
also lucid please read: give me my tokens
catbaealmost 12 years ago
that's actually absurdly unfair in setups with a janitor, leads to potentially catching multiple mafia
1
Togepialmost 12 years ago
Oh man that's awesome that he did that.
Evolalmost 12 years agoedited
no LOLUMAD

as the example in the OP shows harrold voted first i voted second and there were no switching votes, also watcher had picked his target before mafia voted.
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
Lucid please read

Goodbar's wrong