haha who cares just play mafia and don't cheat. that's how you win trophies imho
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
Can I know if it is someone who is doing well enough to threaten me? : )
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
well i made a thread about it in mod forums and i'm still in the process of getting someone to validate/invalidate my suspicions. i will say that based on what i found on someone on the leaderboard, i would pause the round if i have not gotten a second set of eyes by the time the round ends.
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
Is this pastebin still happening and is it on someone besides abc?
honestly the most relieving feeling is making a pastebin on someone that you think is highly conclusive, getting 3/4s the way through all of their games, then accidentally deleting the pastebin. i encourage all of you to replicate this feeling
hmm that's not a bad argument. maybe i was wrong. ehhhhhh. linking to something for the purposes of guisetesting isn't necessarily OGI, but i think that it is OGI when it constitutes specific personal information that you expect a user to know. if that makes sense (by this i mean posting habits, things said in threads, etc. as opposed to "i can speak french" tests)
Giga didn't need to link it though he just linked for easier access.
Say my guise test was about the movie of the wizard of oz and I was using Wikipedia to check it. When I find it I could say "Wikipedia says this" or link to Wikipedia. It's the same result.
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
actually that was a bad example because i just remembered you can prepare night meeting messages as mafia so let's pretend i didn't say it :-)
basically i think any scenario where you have to link something to prove something in a game is OGI. telling people to go to the fourms and search for x? haha who knows, we'll wait for that to come up when it does. anyway that's my reasoning.
Not only is the C+P of gigas link irrelevant to his own role, but outside of the guise test completely irrelevant to the game. The only way you could argue it's wrong is because it "proves" the information, but as I already explained, information that is available to everyone can easily be proven without links, and you can't say links are bad yet say that "check xyz thread in epicmafias general discussion thread" is completely okay. They are equivalent.
There is a huge difference that is not at all relevant to the current case.
The big deal there is that you can use the speed, one which is impossible for you to type, to prove you C+P'd a report, something that directly shows that you're that role, because none of the other roles can c+p a system message
deleteddeletedalmost 12 years ago
that's like saying there's no difference between manually typing out a report and c/ping a night meeting.
What's the difference between the two, why is linking worse than saying "he necrobumped a thread called X on the General Discussion Forum, it's the third one on the list, check it if you want"?
