Never forget, brothers & sisters of EM - we play on an unstable child's personal echo chamber. Please spread this message and ignore any moderator decisions until charley has been overthrown and her sycophants removed from power.
I'm encouraging everyone to play the game how it's meant to be played; push the meta forward, never follow a strategy just because it's enforced, and above all don't make gameplay choices because of how you feel about someone personally. If you get a violation or a ban from our corrupt mod team (and I can't stress enough the word "team" there), ask me how to download & install Tor. It's actually really easy these days, it's not super clunky like how it used to be.
When I'm actually unbanned I'm not going to play any games on this account (the less ammo they have the better), I'm just going to use it for my Carmen For Moderator campaign. Soon we can actually end this, the TRUE reason Epicmafia is dying. It's not Lucid or even the coding problems, it's the selfish, arrogant clique who hate their own community, and are saddled with running it.
Actually a horrible user to play with/interact with
deletedabout 8 years
ally i have a hypothetical game for you to mod.
a, b, c are mafia. b and c decide to law b instead of c, because c will not be checked. a wants lawed instead and b and a get in fight over who ccs and all fight over who gets lawed. b/c vote and wait for him to hammer. b has to nl though for carol. so then at kicks a gets mad about who is getting lawed and just votes no one. it was kicked so the other mafia could not change their vote.. then after this they all play the game normally
did a gt/troll/etc?
mods mod this report
whos getting reported
the person getting reported does not matter, beyond they have experience. it should be based only on what happened in the game and not who reported and was reported
a, b, c are mafia. b and c decide to law b instead of c, because c will not be checked. a wants lawed instead and b and a get in fight over who ccs and all fight over who gets lawed. b/c vote and wait for him to hammer. b has to nl though for carol. so then at kicks a gets mad about who is getting lawed and just votes no one. it was kicked so the other mafia could not change their vote.. then after this they all play the game normally
did a gt/troll/etc?
mods mod this report
whos getting reported
the person getting reported does not matter, beyond they have experience. it should be based only on what happened in the game and not who reported and was reported
a, b, c are mafia. b and c decide to law b instead of c, because c will not be checked. a wants lawed instead and b and a get in fight over who ccs and all fight over who gets lawed. b/c vote and wait for him to hammer. b has to nl though for carol. so then at kicks a gets mad about who is getting lawed and just votes no one. it was kicked so the other mafia could not change their vote.. then after this they all play the game normally
did a gt/troll/etc?
mods mod this report
No Vio, Sandbox games are not moderated for game-related violations.
good but the question is for a main game sorry. you are hired though!
a, b, c are mafia. b and c decide to law b instead of c, because c will not be checked. a wants lawed instead and b and a get in fight over who ccs and all fight over who gets lawed. b/c vote and wait for him to hammer. b has to nl though for carol. so then at kicks a gets mad about who is getting lawed and just votes no one. it was kicked so the other mafia could not change their vote.. then after this they all play the game normally
did a gt/troll/etc?
mods mod this report
No Vio, Sandbox games are not moderated for game-related violations.
deletedabout 8 years
ally i have a hypothetical game for you to mod.
a, b, c are mafia. b and c decide to law b instead of c, because c will not be checked. a wants lawed instead and b and a get in fight over who ccs and all fight over who gets lawed. b/c vote and wait for him to hammer. b has to nl though for carol. so then at kicks a gets mad about who is getting lawed and just votes no one. it was kicked so the other mafia could not change their vote.. then after this they all play the game normally
did a gt/troll/etc?
mods mod this report
whos getting reported
the person getting reported does not matter, beyond they have experience. it should be based only on what happened in the game and not who reported and was reported
a, b, c are mafia. b and c decide to law b instead of c, because c will not be checked. a wants lawed instead and b and a get in fight over who ccs and all fight over who gets lawed. b/c vote and wait for him to hammer. b has to nl though for carol. so then at kicks a gets mad about who is getting lawed and just votes no one. it was kicked so the other mafia could not change their vote.. then after this they all play the game normally
did a gt/troll/etc?
mods mod this report
whos getting reported
deletedabout 8 years
ally i have a hypothetical game for you to mod.
a, b, c are mafia. b and c decide to law b instead of c, because c will not be checked. a wants lawed instead and b and a get in fight over who ccs and all fight over who gets lawed. b/c vote and wait for him to hammer. b has to nl though for carol. so then at kicks a gets mad about who is getting lawed and just votes no one. it was kicked so the other mafia could not change their vote.. then after this they all play the game normally
copying game mechanics is against the rules, it doesn't have to me strictly through copy/paste but you literally copied most of the game mechanics which you shouldn't do. It makes it obvious that you're a cop, gives you unfair advantage and ruins the game. Literally anybody would tell you that it's copying game mechanics and those of you who argue that it's not are dumb. Even if there's a word or two missing you made it obvious that you were copying the game's mechanics which is considered cheating.
Maybe you didn't know which is why Shoopie said that she could help you get a note/warning for it rather than a vio if you appeal for it. Bashing the moderators for something that you did but refuse to aknowledge isn't right.