OMFG YOU JUST QUOTED MY POST BEFORE I QUOTED YOURS TOO. YOU'RE THE WORST.

claire's read on lelmoo is her copying me tho. i had that read first.

What part of my statement are you disagreeing with?

Ally

i think that scott takes a different approach on this than the rest of us and i don't think it's necessarily a wrong approach, it's just more of an analytical facts based approach than a scumreading approach and that's a useful technique to have as long as everyone is willing to hear each other out

Going at a game that way only works if 1 set of data is correct every time but when Data in a game like this will change and peoples outlooks will change you're more likely to get an error then be correct Modred could bus (Bus means call other evil out) all there partners and be the only one on a mission to fail it so going by the term "Person F has been right so there town" isn't gonna work

Ally

i think that scott takes a different approach on this than the rest of us and i don't think it's necessarily a wrong approach, it's just more of an analytical facts based approach than a scumreading approach and that's a useful technique to have as long as everyone is willing to hear each other out

people's voting patterns are not facts based. it's a fact that they vote a different way, but there's no factual way to add them up to get an answer that's useful

Ally

i think that scott takes a different approach on this than the rest of us and i don't think it's necessarily a wrong approach, it's just more of an analytical facts based approach than a scumreading approach and that's a useful technique to have as long as everyone is willing to hear each other out

people's voting patterns are not facts based. it's a fact that they vote a different way, but there's no factual way to add them up to get an answer that's useful

i think jeff is town now because he's meaner when he's town.

i think jeff is town now because he's meaner when he's town.

i think that scott takes a different approach on this than the rest of us and i don't think it's necessarily a wrong approach, it's just more of an analytical facts based approach than a scumreading approach and that's a useful technique to have as long as everyone is willing to hear each other out

i think that scott takes a different approach on this than the rest of us and i don't think it's necessarily a wrong approach, it's just more of an analytical facts based approach than a scumreading approach and that's a useful technique to have as long as everyone is willing to hear each other out

Okay one last thing. The difference between this and mafia is that in mafia you can act exactly like town during the day and kill people at night and everything is fine.

In this game you actually have to ensure that evil gets on at least 3 of the missions...so you have to do things and take actions to ensure that happens. So trying to point out what those things could possibly be is helpful information.

Look I gave you my read. For whatever reason I strongly believe that the last team is something the evil didn't want to go through - for whatever reason, just based on the number of rejections.

I also think Bryce was super suspect completely changing his team up the way he did just because Sonia came up first and said put me on.

You can take what I'm saying and completely throw it out because it's not based on people's interactions...but I'm frankly terrible at that so trying to contribute in a way I'm good at.

I'm done arguing for now I have a meeting.

Lelmoo

I disagree with that but okay!

How long have you played mafia if any....

BRING BACK FLOPMOO.

I disagree with that but okay!