← Back to Epicmafia

Rule Fixing

xxeroxover 9 years ago

I beg the moderator team to start editing the rules - Fixing and improving.

For one, it is very annoying how they make up new rules or that they state things that are not on the rule page.

Secondly there should be imporvement on the rules.

Minor changes.

One of the rule changes i want the Repeated suicide violtion to have lower requirements.

Warning - From 15% to be changed to 10%

Then the second - Loby Ban to be given at 15%

And if they have been warned about the 10% but after 2 months period (The violation's leinght) They still haven't lowered their % under 10, to be lobby banned.

glowover 9 years ago
cuz im baffled
glowover 9 years ago
ok but foreal can a mod tell me why self voting and not saying anything when ur town isnt isp
glowover 9 years ago
you can answer whitepimp
Whitepimp007over 9 years ago
glow
why isnt self voting when youre town isp
You're gonna make his brain hurt if you keep asking reasonable questions like this.
glowover 9 years ago
why isnt self voting when youre town isp
Memerygaover 9 years ago
Hype!
Whitepimp007over 9 years ago
Memeryga
Whitepimp007
xxerox
Memeryga
xxerox, would you like to be interviewed for the Epicmafia Tribune?
Is this another attempt for a paper?

Because last one was discontinued.
It is the official EM paper. It's great so far. Memeryga is an amazing journalist who is more than fair in his reporting.
I am now going to advertise as the official paper since Whitepimp007 endorses me.
Maybe we can get Lucid to add a link for it from the lobby page.
Memerygaover 9 years ago
Whitepimp007
xxerox
Memeryga
xxerox, would you like to be interviewed for the Epicmafia Tribune?
Is this another attempt for a paper?

Because last one was discontinued.
It is the official EM paper. It's great so far. Memeryga is an amazing journalist who is more than fair in his reporting.
I am now going to advertise as the official paper since Whitepimp007 endorses me.
Whitepimp007over 9 years ago
xxerox
Memeryga
xxerox, would you like to be interviewed for the Epicmafia Tribune?
Is this another attempt for a paper?

Because last one was discontinued.
It is the official EM paper. It's great so far. Memeryga is an amazing journalist who is more than fair in his reporting.
xxeroxover 9 years ago
Memeryga
xxerox, would you like to be interviewed for the Epicmafia Tribune?
Is this another attempt for a paper?

Because last one was discontinued.
Memerygaover 9 years ago
xxerox, would you like to be interviewed for the Epicmafia Tribune?
10
xxeroxover 9 years ago
And that their past decisions are just a "mistake?"
xxeroxover 9 years ago
You are implying mods are allowed to change their decision every 5 minutes depending on how they feel like it ?
xxeroxover 9 years ago
After a report is Sustained, it can't be changed.

A sustain can't be changed. In the rules is stated that a Sustain cannot be appealed.

A mod changing his statement to OT from Sustain, does not work after the report has been Sustained.

It shouldn't work.
deleteddeletedover 9 years ago
stop playing dumb xxero. The original mod that sustained it changed it to an appeal and then lono handed it. Think this is normally how its done. its better than giving vios that were BS
xxeroxover 9 years ago
With this i would suggest Either changing the Appeal and Report Rules and adding them in a separate page so more people to read them, OR revoking Lono's decision by the current ruleset.
xxeroxover 9 years ago
Ok Today i found this.

https://epicmafia.com/topic/83723

Moderator Lono ignores all Appeal rules and OT a report alone, that has been sustained by 2 moderators already.

Lono was not the original report handler.

https://epicmafia.com/topic/61693 - Appeal Rules.


Can someone explain this to me ? How can one moderator have more power than 2 others if it is not stated in the appeal rules at all ?
Whitepimp007over 9 years agoedited
mt01
Whitepimp007
townyyy
I think that notes should be required to satisfy the actual rule. I have gotten so many gt vio notes when I had no intent and it was just like a misshammer.
If it satisfies the rule, it's a vio, not a note. We can't read your mind, so we don't know if you had intent. That's why you get notes.
i have never intentionally played against my role condition and this should be evident, yet i am given a gt note like once a week. if there is clearly no intent, they should not be noting it. borderline intent only should be....
If there is clearly no intent, it's a novio, not a note. What don't you get here?

Clearly intent: Vio

Not clear: Note

Clearly no intent: No vio
deleteddeletedover 9 years ago
Whitepimp007
townyyy
I think that notes should be required to satisfy the actual rule. I have gotten so many gt vio notes when I had no intent and it was just like a misshammer.
If it satisfies the rule, it's a vio, not a note. We can't read your mind, so we don't know if you had intent. That's why you get notes.
i have never intentionally played against my role condition and this should be evident, yet i am given a gt note like once a week. if there is clearly no intent, they should not be noting it. borderline intent only should be....
Whitepimp007over 9 years ago
townyyy
I think that notes should be required to satisfy the actual rule. I have gotten so many gt vio notes when I had no intent and it was just like a misshammer.
If it satisfies the rule, it's a vio, not a note. We can't read your mind, so we don't know if you had intent. That's why you get notes.
10
exposeover 9 years ago
That's not really an example of an unwritten rule or a rule that was made up. Voting against the clear is not in of itself GT and never has been. It's simply a violation you received based on discretion depending on the circumstances. It could also have been bad moderation.
deleteddeletedover 9 years ago
expose
For one, it is very annoying how they make up new rules or that they state things that are not on the rule page.
It's not helpful to make vague statements like this without specific examples. Which rules were made up and which rules are not written?

As for the latter, a lot of guidelines aren't written on the official Rules page. However, they can be found either in the forums, in verdicts on reports, or explicitly written in the Moderator Forums. So although you may not see something on the Rules page does not mean it's not written ~somewhere~.
i gave an example. I think its more of an issue with mod abuse though. I even was banned for gting cause pranay reported me and the mods did not really read the game (this was around the time that I started playing comp). It has been a misshammer that pranay would have hammered too if you read him in gy. It was later overturned after I had been banned for a day but was bs to get it for a misshammer.... I was ranked 5 at the time of the ban too, and I lost 5 hearts cause of this ban and it knocked me out of the round then.

I think that notes should be required to satisfy the actual rule. I have gotten so many gt vio notes when I had no intent and it was just like a misshammer.
deleteddeletedover 9 years ago
looks like xxerox found something else to complain about
deleteddeletedover 9 years ago
Rules are gay
exposeover 9 years ago
For one, it is very annoying how they make up new rules or that they state things that are not on the rule page.
It's not helpful to make vague statements like this without specific examples. Which rules were made up and which rules are not written?

As for the latter, a lot of guidelines aren't written on the official Rules page. However, they can be found either in the forums, in verdicts on reports, or explicitly written in the Moderator Forums. So although you may not see something on the Rules page does not mean it's not written ~somewhere~.