Post and I'll attempt to make a short case against you for cheating. They won't be joke cases they'll be serious attempts to give evidence that you cheated, regardless of whether or not I think you're a cheater.
Disclaimer: despite the fact that these are not joke cases, this thread is for entertainment purposes only and anyone who posts, no matter how much I think they didn't cheat, will get a case against them if I can think of one.
idk why it doesn't just get corrected back to how it should be handled? the only reason this became precedent was because whiny people like pranay threw a fit and got his way
deleteddeletedalmost 10 years ago
there was probably a good reason for the rule to begin with and i can see it being necessary but yeah it's one of those things that is taken too far.
For one your run on alphaturtle43 had Charley in it with a whopping 19 games played with her.
Charley is a known cheater / socialite and you were friends with her at the time. You played second most with PonyLove who is a part of the Duffs like you.
Ponylove is young and given the Duffs atmosphere has no reason not to pick up a cheating / throwing mentality.
Considering that you've won a number of trophies in rounds with a high density of friends in your games (Cody, Charlie, Pony, Dyl, among others) and 0 trophies to my knowledge in rounds that didn't have a bunch of your friends, the logical conclusion is that there's some correlation between the two, especially when your friends also always end up placing high in the round and/or trophying with you.
