Epicmafia

← Back to Off Topic

Trump vs. Hillary

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

Who's excited? it's going to be a battle for the ages

Trump2016

Poll

Who??

Trump51%73

Hillary48%68

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

are you saying bernie still has a chance to come back? or that trump will be dethroned?

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

Those are NOT the nominations. The nominations are not complete. The only reason these two have gotten so far is because people have ASSUMED them winners. I'm sick of that. I'm waiting till the nominations are complete.

madhereover 10 years ago

>i dont like my choices so i am angry that i have a choice
what do you want? an autocracy?

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

What the hell? If it's trump vs Hillary I may as well not vote at all. This is ridiculous. I'm not playing to this fantasy. I refuse to believe they will be the nominees.

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

Who else is protest voting third party this election?

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

Hibiki

Slowbro
edit: nevermind it doesn't mean what i think it does
huh

i made a post and then i edited it

Hibikiover 10 years ago

Slowbro

edit: nevermind it doesn't mean what i think it does

huh

Orlyover 10 years ago

the bernie dream is dead so now i will become an ironic trump supporter

wish me luck, lads

Orlyover 10 years ago

little marco was too low energy

deleteddeletedover 10 years agoedited

edit: nevermind it doesn't mean what i think it does

TheSpicyMangoover 10 years ago

both are terrible

deleteddeletedover 10 years agoedited

Rutab was one of the most ubiquitous posters in this thread until his guy (Marco Rubio) failed to win the state in which he is a sitting senator and dropped out with his tail between his legs.

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

Correct

deleteddeletedover 10 years agoedited

rutab

hey everyone who even cares about this right now March Madness is happening

people who care about something shouldn't IMO, instead care about this thing i care about

Hibikiover 10 years ago

republicans are subhuman

deleteddeletedover 10 years agoedited

I just hear words "break up the big banks" and go.

no where in those words did anyone clarify how! that's why I literally ask "does that mean a rule..."

so excuuuuuuse me

Also, what banks failed or were close to failing in 2008, lehman brothers, merill lynch? are those commercial or have a commercial arm? nope? okay....wait, so what's the problem then?

Edarkover 10 years agoedited

Im pretty sure you dont realize what breaking up the banks mean when you make arguments like these:

Germatron

also, while I admit the banks may be too big (may in italics)

The idea of the government breaking up a company is a slippery road.

Also, does that mean a rule would need to be put into place saying "once a bank gets X big, we break it up!"

How do you quantify X? But the bigger issue is how will the banks that are

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

hey everyone who even cares about this right now March Madness is happening

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

Kylo

Slowbro
i've always heard and said it as "la zay"
Maybe you think I'm a bigot because my sense of humor is too tongue-in-cheek for you. Maybe that's it.

if bigot is now the word for different then yes

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

I see edark finally found his words.

was that so hard

I see your point, but I still disagree

deleteddeletedover 10 years ago

Slowbro

i've always heard and said it as "la zay"

Maybe you think I'm a bigot because my sense of humor is too tongue-in-cheek for you. Maybe that's it.

Edarkover 10 years ago

Germatron

Slowbro
you don't diversify industries, you diversify a portfolio
yes, but edarks arguemnt for breaking up the big banks is diversifying...so, I guess he thinks you do

Separation between investment banking and retail banking is what "breaking up" the banks means

deleteddeletedover 10 years agoedited

i've always heard and said it as "la zay"

edit: actually i'm pretty sure that was the joke too