36 hours per day, 12 hours per night. Days may end early if a majority lynch is reached.
II. The Setup:
Normal closed roles setup, as always, with the roles and affixes listed below. Any role can be town or mafia, and have any number of affixes.
By default there are no Night 1 actions, including the mafia kill.
By default no role can self visit, except watcher.
Players who share a meeting may communicate outside the game at any time of day.
Players are always notified at day start if their role is changed.
One mafia always leads the kill, and it's always the one that submits the kill last. Each mafia will visit the kill target.
On death, players flip their role, alignment and affix type by default, but not their affix details.
III. Supermajority Lynch Rules:
A lynch will happen immediately if a supermajority vote is reached (e.g. 9/16)
At end of day, "No votes" count as "no one" votes, but will not count towards a mid-day supermajority vote of "no one". The player with the most votes at that end of day, (including "no one") will be lynched.
Days can be ended early without a lynch by a supermajority "no one" vote.
Yeah, largely. I just thought the vote in and of itself was fair enough because you weren't getting voted and I'm sure I'm not the only one that wants to LYNCH SOMEONE DAMNIT.
Voting without outing logic isn't even necessarily a scumtell. Antikrist explained themselves after that, too.
I still think antikrist could be scum for other reasons including the fact that their SR on you in the first place was sort of following others' outed reads. If strag convinces me that voting stove will help us in any way if stove flips town, I'll do it.
alright i was nice about you guys lynching claire but if you mother effers think for even one second to lynch my top townread there's gonna be problems. stop the silliness now.
deleteddeletedover 10 years agoedited
My point was literally to have a general consensus since I was originally going to sleep.
can you elaborate on this? what exactly do you mean; it kind of just sounds like your point is "don't split the votes further" but i think i might be misunderstanding
edit: Happy? I think she has stopped towntelling almost completely, transcend has started isping, and I don't get Strag's logic behind a vote on Stove giving better reads on other players.
Edit: towntelling* stopped towntelling. And it wasn't complete.
Perish, I think BWing in this context is not worth a hard SR. It's almost the end of the day and you weren't getting voted. I GET IT, I just don't think it's good logic to suddenly push on someone who wasn't really being pushed on. ;-;
IT WAS A TERRIBLE VOTE AND I'M NOT JUST LETTING IT GO. YOU PEOPLE WHINE ABOUT HAVING NOTHING TO WORK ON AND FRICKING MOVE TO LYNCH A GODDAMN ISPER BUT WHEN SOMEONE ACTUALLY SCUMTELLS YOU JUST SHRUG IT OFF AND HALFHEARTEDLY AGREE OR DISAGREE AND LET THE OPPORTUNITY PASS. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE??
YOU THINK SCUMREADING SOMEONE BECAUSE THEY JOINED A BW THEY'VE REPEATEDLY CAMPAIGNED AGAINST WITH OVER AN HOUR LEFT IN THE DAY WHEN THE PERSON WHO STARTED THE DAMN BW IS THEIR NUMBER ONE FRICKING SCUMREAD ISN'T GOOD LOGIC? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU??? WHAT TOWN PLAYER WOULD DO THAT? AM I JUST SUPPOSED TO PRESUME THAT YOU'RE ALL COMPLETELY THOUGHTLESS?? IS THAT REALLY THE BOTTOM LINE AND I NEED TO EXCUSE ALL PLAY THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE BLATANTLY SCUMMY BECAUSE YOU'RE ALL JUST THAT BAD??
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
I was honestly about to go to bed and I wanted to do this vote as a town. And then I decided to unvote once Perish made that comment. If she would've explained that it looked like I was BW, a different story. But Perish hardly has been using logic.
IF YOU WANT TO TRY TO REFUTE LOGIC OUTTED WHICH PAINTS YOU AS SCUM BY ALL MEANS DO SO BUT FOR GOODNESS SAKE JUST IGNORING IT AND SAYING "WOW THERE'S STILL NO LEGITIMATE REASON TO LYNCH ME HUH??" IS JUST UNACCEPTABLE PLAY AND THIS TOWN NEEDS TO STOP LETTING SO MANY PEOPLE GET AWAY WITH IT.