Epicmafia

perekingabout 11 years ago

Arguing with you is exhausting

Arcbellabout 11 years ago

pereking

Arcbell
pereking
ya you got me arcbell, i didn't have an opinion about the mountain of evidence presented because I didn't write it in a pastebin

every mod wanted them banned which is why they were banned until jasper woke up and told us arcbell/shacky convinced him "it just wasn't enough".
pereking no no no im not saying u didn't have an opinion, i'm saying u didn't have an opinion with enough merit to present as an argument (:
and i'm letting you know you're wrong (:

well you didn't post anything worthwhile on the piratepad, which was the de-facto staging area for that cheating investigation, so you can see why i'd assume you didn't have a secret pastebin that supported your opinion that you just decided not to share with the class.

Togepiabout 11 years ago

I can't believe I am defending Arcbell, but I think what he is trying to say is that he has provided the games for the mod team to sift through.

It will all be okay...

perekingabout 11 years ago

Arcbell

pereking
ya you got me arcbell, i didn't have an opinion about the mountain of evidence presented because I didn't write it in a pastebin

every mod wanted them banned which is why they were banned until jasper woke up and told us arcbell/shacky convinced him "it just wasn't enough".
pereking no no no im not saying u didn't have an opinion, i'm saying u didn't have an opinion with enough merit to present as an argument (:

and i'm letting you know you're wrong (:

Arcbellabout 11 years ago

pereking

ya you got me arcbell, i didn't have an opinion about the mountain of evidence presented because I didn't write it in a pastebin

every mod wanted them banned which is why they were banned until jasper woke up and told us arcbell/shacky convinced him "it just wasn't enough".

pereking no no no im not saying u didn't have an opinion, i'm saying u didn't have an opinion with enough merit to present as an argument (:

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

if only Eris was still Caching, i'd buckle down and sift through this heap

Arcbellabout 11 years agoedited

Arcbell

From the games I've looked at so far (about 1/4 of them) there's a pattern where Zwink always votes at the start of the day and CocaCola blindly sheeps it, usually in through a lynch. Especially if they're both town. CocaCola never seems to misread Zwink from what I've seen.

perekingabout 11 years ago

ya you got me arcbell, i didn't have an opinion about the mountain of evidence presented because I didn't write it in a pastebin

every mod wanted them banned which is why they were banned until jasper woke up and told us arcbell/shacky convinced him "it just wasn't enough".

Hibikiabout 11 years ago

arcbell, you've changes your indictment every 5 or so pages. i think it's about time you let it go

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

Boy if I made a thread and posted about it for on-and-off 31 pages I sure wouldn't admit I don't have good enough material

You've got some balls

deleteddeletedabout 11 years agoedited

Arcbell

so if i play with 2 of my friends and they, to help me, make a rule where they always sheep me, that's not meta abuse?

I said this hypothetical is throwing, please don't misquote me Arcbell, it's not nice

Arcbellabout 11 years ago

Twist

So in other words all the games in the OP don't actually prove anything because they aren't in a Paste

yes that is correct. this thread is a starting point.

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

So in other words all the games in the OP don't actually prove anything because they aren't in a Paste

Arcbellabout 11 years ago

pereking

Voting the same person as zwink at daystart is throwing?

and most of the time following through with it, and townreading zwink regardless of outcome.

Arcbellabout 11 years ago

mist

not that i was there, but just because he didn't write stuff down doesn't mean he didn't read the games.

in my experience when you go through the trouble to read ALL the games in service to the mod team, but end up not actually writing anything, it's because you don't really feel you have anything good enough to write. i've experienced this myself when i don't write pastebins

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

Arcbell

i guess jasper just didn't deem your "i think they're cheating" to be all that pithy.

well rutab sure thought it was "pithy" enough

perekingabout 11 years ago

Voting the same person as zwink at daystart is throwing?

Arcbellabout 11 years agoedited

fine *wasn't enough evidence of role sharing. it was a while ago

mild to moderate meta abuse, yes. this zwink stuff isn't meta abuse it's systematic throwing, as devante pointed out

and i assure you everything worthwhile about the case was communicated to me. i guess jasper just didn't deem your "i think they're cheating" to be all that pithy.

perekingabout 11 years ago

You weren't a mod, which is why you do not remember the things I said in mod chat

does this ring any bells?

deleteddeletedabout 11 years ago

not that i was there, but just because he didn't write stuff down doesn't mean he didn't read the games.

Arcbellabout 11 years ago

that's not what i remember from the pirate pad. it was just a big 'ol wall-of-me going through their games alongside riot's analysis and explaining how there was no rolesharing.

perekingabout 11 years ago

Arcbell

so you read every game but couldn't muster an analysis? perhaps because the evidence didn't fit your predesignated conclusion? :-)

I read every game and said they were cheating, as did you

Arcbellabout 11 years ago

so you read every game but couldn't muster an analysis? perhaps because the evidence didn't fit your predesignated conclusion? :-)

perekingabout 11 years agoedited

Arcbell

pereking
i just find it funny that arcbell, who thought two users that were friends and coordinated to play games together and won every game they did should not get cheating, says two users who did not coordinate to play games together and were not friends and naturally developed a way of playing a setup (everyone voting one person as a reaction test) should
if you'd actually read the games closely yourself instead of taking riot's word for it and lazily voting to ban them you'd know these cases are nothing alike.

reminder that the only reason i was involved in that case at all was because none of the mods were up to the task of reading the games and making their own content...

that's funny seeing as I read every game and all the other evidence, and so did you. And I agree that they are nothing alike, as prevail was actually cheating.

And no I'm pretty sure the only reason you were involved in that case was because you involved yourself in it

Arcbellabout 11 years agoedited

pereking

i just find it funny that arcbell, who thought two users that were friends and coordinated to play games together and won every game they did should not get cheating, says two users who did not coordinate to play games together and were not friends and naturally developed a way of playing a setup (everyone voting one person as a reaction test) should

if you'd actually read the games closely yourself instead of taking riot's word for it and lazily voting to ban them you'd know these cases are nothing alike.

reminder that the only reason i was involved in that case at all was because none of the mods were up to the task of reading the games and making their own content...