the anonymous moderator clearly doesn't lynch mafferz n not townerz
gotta love it when an anonymous epicmafia moderator takes constant potshots at me
Duke blacksnakemoan Duke anyways, as long as im not stuck on a table with pranay, blacksnake, maymay, or some obnoxious player that has been playing 2 years and thinks they are pro now... i usually enjoy myself. or
conjunction
1.
used to link alternatives.
"a cup of tea or coffee"
2.
introducing a synonym or explanation of a preceding word or phrase.
"yoga is a series of postures, or asanas"
Using definition 2, my reading of your comment was spot on.
i love to lynch mafferz n not townerz
goal of da game = lynch mafferz n not townerz. projectdoom was obv town so u dont lynch projectdoom
Who else would they be "guilty testing"?
you weren't clear about the "obvious town" part because i missed it
Didn't realize that "obvious town" and "obvious miller" were different sides of a coin.
That is literally what I've been saying...
zovea, all you had to say was "the miller was obviously miller. devante is stupid" and you won the argument 3 pages back
The only time you shouldn't kill blatant or confirmed mafia is if the next day you're facing mylo/lylo with no clears.
And the game throwing part would be confirming his partner, not trying to get lynched.
mist UniversalStudios Devante if the guilty was lawyer You weren't town blatantly trying to get lynched because lynching obvious scum is too difficult. You also would throw your chance to beat the ml away which stacks the game in favor of town.
mist UniversalStudios Devante if the guilty was lawyer one time i disliked a guy so i hammered my mafia partner in lylo just to slowroll him the next day as i announced that i would hammer him.
U STILL LYNCH IN CAWPS DAWG THEN U DECIDE IF U WANT TO LYNCH THE GUILTY OR NOT GAWD
UniversalStudios Devante if the guilty was lawyer i've offered myself as a guilty check before as lawyer to get townread. it's called wifom.
i don't lynch scumreads unless i have a decent townpool elsewhere to back it up
replace "scum" in "only lynch scum" with "only lynch nontownreads" and you have my play in a nutshell
Strider you guys are arguing principles. "only lynch scum" vs "risking the ML for autowin". safe plays vs risk/reward. both are valid. stop arguing "only lynch scum" is like fighting game logic of "don't get hit". ironically both statements are true, you should basically go for that.
UniversalStudios Using a ml to test a guilty is dumb especially when said guilty is agreeing with the test which would be gamethrowing for scum. first of all it wouldn't be gamethrowing considering as hooker i always wifom into auto loss, and end up winning the game.
secondly you're stupid.
