Yeah, I can agree with that. I mean, I play video games, so I guess I'm a gamer but it seems like a really useless label.
I don't think so. You can make a pretty fair critique over the portrayal of woman in a lot of video games, but even if the critiques were incredibly stupid, people should still be allowed to criticize them as much as they want. I think that a lot of the gamergate thing is people caring way too much about whether or not someone critiques the video game industry and reacting terribly.
That being said though, there are probably better things to worry about than how woman are portrayed in some video games.
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
No, I do too lol
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
am i the only one who time and again reads pjm as pajama
3
deleteddeletedover 11 years agoedited
actually it's about ethics in gaming journalism ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
yes i do feel the need to switch accounts when i shitpost
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
video games are ok but i think gamer is a gross self-label in the same way that i think drugs are okay but think less of people that think of themselves as stoners
do u think sjws are trying to kill video games 4 everyone
I tried reading up on the controversy in an attempt to understand it but I came out really confused and annoyed. It seems to be like a bunch of different people are fighting a bunch of different issues at once and calling it the same thing. And by fighting, I mean either posting angrily on the internet or doxxing those who they perceive as at threat.
