I know he did, but I believed he made the cutoff specifically to ban A/D. He banned it because of the cutoff he made specifically to get rid of it, it wouldn't make sense if the cutoff was higher
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
satan i'm sorry about what i said about you being the next worst poster on the site. that is clearly rutab's placement. #utahraptor
i, personally, would have set the threshold for blacklisting at 42town/57scum regardless of whether A&D was affected, my thinking being that anything more scumsided than SDS is too scumsided. bronto may have been biased but i agree with the decision
1
deleteddeletedover 11 years ago
i feel a&d was a legitimate setup.
deleteddeletedover 11 years agoedited
no, he's right. bronto got rid of A&D purely because he doesn't like it (though he tried to substantiate that opinion with the fact that it was almost at the threshold for blacklisting)
edit: dan just messaged me: "yeah, i didn't like A&D, but there were no guidelines written prior to mine that explained what the threshold was. it was all just stuff old mods knew about, and not out in the open. when i made guidelines, i used SDS as the breaking point, because that's the most scumsided setup that people deemed acceptable.
I admit that I did dislike A&D, but i also thought (and continue to think) that the reasons for blacklisting it and making SDS the cut-off anyway were legit"
