I don't know what I'd do. Probably be petrified. I go through the question a lot in my head. I feel like choosing the majority over the one person forces the ideal that they're all equally "important" (whatever that means). The problem with the alternative, determining that the one person is more "important", is that it implies I can even begin to determine who/what is important, or relevant, or more deserving of life, or whatever.
I'm very indecisive as far as philosophical questions are concerned. (And your question is pretty vague. Who is this one person? Under what circumstances am I forced to make this decision?)
thoughts on the moral decision to personally sacrifice one innocent life in order to indirectly save more than innocent one lives and what would you do
I've had a horribly busy one and a half weeks where I was coming home really late and didn't have time to do reports, but that's over now and I'm picking up the pace. Modding can be very interesting. A cool challenge every now and then, though often quite mundane. The first time I was a mod I got to do a lot of personality building, which in hindsight was pretty cool.
